In this reflection I will share with you my feelings
with regard to my own teaching. For sure this course has challenged me as a
teacher in the 21st Century.
First of all after looking at the different
approaches to authentic learning I feel I need to reorganize myself in the way
I teach my students more in order to fit the century challenge.
The different theories about learning all play a
part in the learning process and I feel now I need to design my lessons in such
a way that they make learning a real experience. I have started designing my
lessons putting into consideration the multiple intelligence theory and now constructivism
theory. I need to help my learners create knowledge instead of acquiring it. It
is longer a matter of giving the students the facts that we know but rather
create a situation in class that allows them to discover these facts themselves.
Because
with constructivist, a teacher is supposed to encourage students to constantly
assess how the activity is helping them gain understanding. By questioning
themselves and their strategies, students in the constructivist classroom
ideally become "expert learners." This gives them ever-broadening
tools to keep learning. With a well-planned classroom environment, the students
learn HOW TO LEARN.
So I feel my class should be in such a way that
learning really is constructive, active, collaborative, inquire-based, evolving and reflective.
The chart below compares the traditional classroom and the constructivist classroom.
Traditional classroom
|
Constructivism classroom
|
Curriculum
begins with the parts of the whole. Emphasizes basic skills.
|
Curriculum
emphasizes big concepts, beginning with the whole and expanding to include
the parts.
|
Strict
adherence to fixed curriculum is highly valued.
|
Pursuit
of student questions and interests is valued.
|
Materials
are primarily textbooks and workbooks.
|
Materials
include primary sources of material and manipulative materials.
|
Learning
is based on repetition.
|
Learning
is interactive, building on what the student already knows.
|
Teachers
disseminate information to students; students are recipients of knowledge.
|
Teachers
have a dialogue with students, helping students construct their own
knowledge.
|
Teacher's
role is directive, rooted in authority.
|
Teacher's
role is interactive, rooted in negotiation.
|
Assessment
is through testing, correct answers.
|
Assessment
includes student works, observations, and points of view, as well as tests.
Process is as important as product.
|
Knowledge
is seen as inert.
|
Knowledge
is seen as dynamic, ever changing with our experiences.
|
Students
work primarily alone.
|
Students
work primarily in groups.
|
It
is no longer time to continue talking about it but to see it done in my
classes.
Well done Julius I am happy that you are internalising these approaches. I have no doubt in you that you will do a great job. Please keep us updated of how your Constructivist classes do, share your gains and challenges. Good luck Sir.
ReplyDeleteWell done Julius I am happy that you are internalising these approaches. I have no doubt in you that you will do a great job. Please keep us updated of how your Constructivist classes do, share your gains and challenges. Good luck Sir.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot sir, I will be happy to share my experiences as regards My Constructivism classes.
Delete'I need to help my learners create knowledge instead of acquiring it. It is longer a matter of giving the students the facts that we know but rather create a situation in class that allows them to discover these facts themselves'. Julius, I cannot agree with you more.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot Florence.
DeleteThat is the way to go Julius.
ReplyDeleteHallo Julius, I like your comparisons in table form.
ReplyDeleteWonderfully put. It is time we get the students to control most of their learning and jst sit back and wait to gude them where neccessary. Bravo Julius!
ReplyDelete